Shakib Al Hasan, one of Bangladesh's most celebrated cricketers, is nearing the twilight of his international career. Having already retired from T20 cricket, Shakib expressed his desire to play his final Test match at Mirpur. However, recent developments suggest this may not be feasible.
Following comments from the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) President Faruk Ahmed, Sports Adviser Asif Mahmud Sajib Bhuiyan has also voiced concerns, stating that while Shakib’s security as a player is ensured, protecting him from public outrage stemming from his political affiliations is beyond their scope.
Addressing journalists on Sunday (29 September), Asif Mahmud clarified, “As a player, Shakib’s security is guaranteed. However, seeking security against the anger brewing in the public due to his position as a member of parliament from the fascist government is unrealistic.”
He further emphasised that Shakib needs to clarify his political stance, noting, “Shakib Al Hasan carries two identities—one as a cricketer and another as a politician. He contested the MP elections under the Awami League banner. Public sentiment is mixed concerning both of these roles.”
Asif Mahmud referenced former cricketer Mashrafe Bin Mortaza, saying, “I believe Shakib must clarify his position, particularly from a political standpoint. Mashrafe Bin Mortaza has already spoken on the matter.”
Regarding security concerns, Asif Mahmud elaborated, “Shakib will receive all necessary security as a player. When he is in the country, we will ensure it. As for the murder case filed against him, we have already conveyed that, provided he is not directly involved, the case can be dismissed at the preliminary stage, as confirmed by the Ministry of Law.”
However, he also remarked on the issue of public anger, “If there is widespread resentment against him due to his political identity, then… imagine I have five constables and a gunman for protection. But if ten crore or sixteen crore people are angry with me, what security can these five or six individuals provide? I must address the public’s concerns with my words to reduce this resentment.”
Previously, last Thursday, after a BCB meeting, President Faruk Ahmed had addressed Shakib’s security concerns, shifting the responsibility to the government.
He remarked, “The matter of security is not in BCB's hands. Shakib himself must decide on this. The Board cannot provide individual security. This issue must be addressed at a higher governmental level. The BCB is not an agency, police, or RAB. Security must come from the government.”
