Bilateral relations between Bangladesh and India appear to be on a downward trajectory following the reciprocal summoning of each nation’s high commissioner.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs summoned India’s acting high commissioner last Thursday, citing concerns over incidents of arson and vandalism at various sites, including the residence of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman in Dhanmondi 32.
In response, the Indian Ministry of External Affairs summoned Bangladesh’s acting high commissioner, Md Nurul Islam, the following day in New Delhi.
Foreign Affairs Adviser Touhid Hossain, while speaking from Delhi, alleged that Sheikh Hasina’s recent remarks had been provocative.
He characterised the events at Dhanmondi 32 as an outburst of student anger, asserting, “Sheikh Hasina continues to provoke unrest, and despite repeated requests, India has not intervened to curtail her statements. We believe these incidents are a direct consequence of that inaction.”
The adviser further claimed that despite continuous appeals, India had taken no measures to curb Hasina’s activities on social media.
Conversely, the Indian Ministry of External Affairs clarified that Hasina’s virtual addresses since seeking refuge in India were conducted independently, with no involvement from the Indian government.
During the summons in New Delhi, officials reiterated that her activities were personal initiatives and should not impinge upon bilateral ties.
Spokesperson Jaiswal stated, “Nurul Islam was informed that India seeks a positive, constructive, and mutually beneficial relationship with Bangladesh. We expect Bangladesh to contribute to maintaining a conducive environment for the betterment of bilateral relations.”
Commenting on the matter, former ambassador Munshi Fayez said, “Both nations have a tendency to deflect blame onto each other, which can temporarily strain diplomatic ties. However, such tensions often dissipate over time. Bangladesh must prioritise its internal security to preempt such incidents, as failure to do so may imply tacit approval by the authorities. Regardless, these acts of vandalism tarnish the country’s image.”
International relations analyst and former Dhaka University professor Dr Imtiaz Ahmed observed, “Since 5 August, a negative trend has persisted in Bangladesh-India relations, although efforts are underway to normalise the situation. The summoning of high commissioners is hardly indicative of stable diplomatic ties.”
He drew a parallel with the case of the Dalai Lama, noting, “Despite the Dalai Lama’s political asylum in India, where he runs an ashram and engages with foreign leaders, it has not adversely affected India-China relations. Expecting India to silence Sheikh Hasina seems unrealistic, as it has never done so even in similar contexts.”
