The revocation of 167 journalists' accreditation cards by the interim Bangladeshi government has drawn sharp criticism from various international organisations.
The list reportedly includes numerous professional and active journalists as well as editors.
British media outlet The Independent reported the development on Thursday (14 November).
In a statement, Reporters Without Borders condemned the move, stating that revoking journalists’ accreditation cards encourages "self-censorship".
They further pointed out that although a committee was established to oversee harassment-related cases against journalists, the decision to annul accreditations within just a week of its formation is puzzling.
Transparency International Bangladesh (TIB) highlighted that this measure, coupled with threats and attacks against the press, reflects a trend towards authoritarian rule. TIB’s statement underscored that such steps are contrary to the principles of a democratic society.
Editors' Council of Bangladesh also issued a statement, suggesting that while the Ministry of Information retains the authority to review misuse of accreditation cards, indiscriminate revocation without concrete allegations and evidence threatens press freedom and undermines a democratic environment.
The council warned that such actions risk fostering censorship and a restrictive atmosphere in the media, contradicting the spirit of the July-August uprising.
They further expressed concerns that the move echoes past undemocratic practices under over-controlling regimes.
Notably, Sheikh Hasina fled the country on 5 August following a mass uprising by students and the public, effectively ending the prolonged Awami League rule. Subsequently, an interim government led by Dr Muhammad Yunus was formed on 8 August.
Upon assuming office, the Chief Adviser Dr Yunus vowed to restore democracy and uphold press freedom, remarking in an interview, "Write as you please, criticise us. If you do not write, how will we know what is happening and what is not?"
